Deal Gone Bad – Real Bad

Opening scene of the Godfather with Marlon Brando in the role of Don Vito Corleone.

The price the evangelical church has paid for bowing to the gods of politics and power.

“Bonasera . . . Bonasera . . . What have I ever done to make you treat me so disrespectfully? If you’d come to me in friendship, then this scum that ruined your daughter would be suffering this very day.”

Bonasera came to Don Vito Corleone requesting justice to avenge the disfiguring of his daughter by her boyfriend and another young man. The judge suspended their sentence and let them go free.

Corleone had what Bonasera needed, power, influence, and connections.  Bonasera bowed and kissed the ring of the Godfather. He walked away with a promise of justice and a chain around his ankle.

Bowing to earthly power always exacts a price from you. It has been 41 years since the evangelical church began aggressive pursuit of moral change in America through the political process.  Let’s perform an autopsy on the movement.

Many erroneously believe the impetus of the movement was the Roe vs. Wade Supreme Court decision in 1973 legalizing abortion. 

The battle rages on and 27% of the 2020 electorate will vote based on candidate positions on abortion.

While Roman Catholic bishops immediately urged their communicants to support candidates opposed to abortion, evangelicals had a much different response.

In 1971, the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) passed a resolution that allowed for the possibility of abortion, “…under such conditions as rape, incest, clear evidence of severe fetal deformity, and carefully ascertained evidence of the likelihood of damage to the emotional, mental, and physical health of the mother.” http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/baptist/sbcabres.html

You might want to read that again. The SBC reaffirmed this resolution in 1974 and 1976.

Rev. W.A. Criswell, a former SBC president, applauded the Supreme Court decision.  He opined that “what is the best for the mother and for the future should be allowed.”  https://www.dmagazine.com/frontburner/2014/05/the-late-first-baptist-dallas-pastor-w-a-criswell-was-pro-choice/

In 1977, the SBC changed its view on abortion and adopted the staunch pro-life position it maintains today. https://www.baptistpress.com/resource-library/news/how-southern-baptists-became-pro-life/

The issue that inspired evangelicals to engage in political action was the decision of Richard Nixon in 1970 to withdraw tax-exempt status from schools that practiced racially discriminatory policies.

Conservative political strategist Paul Weyrich and likeminded activists reframed Nixon’s Internal Revenue Service (IRS) action as government intervention into church affairs and an attack on religious freedom. 

Weyrich tried unsuccessfully for years to rally evangelicals around issues like abortion, prayer in schools, and homosexuality, but now he had an issue.

IRS action to withdraw tax-exempt status from Bob Jones University because of its racially discriminatory policies angered southern evangelicals.

Race in America. The more we run from it, the more we run into it.

Evangelicals became active, but Weyrich realized he could not build a national political movement around restricting minority access to education. 

Weyrich and other conservative leaders began looking for a prominent evangelical leader and gifted communicator. Abortion was spiking around the country and they hoped the right spokesman could build on the new evangelical political momentum.

 They found their man in the Reverend Jerry Falwell, pastor of Thomas Rhodes Baptist Church, Lynchburg, VA. In February 1978, a full five years after Roe vs. Wade, Falwell preached his FIRST sermon against abortion.

Falwell declared that abortion was murder and a moral issue, not a political issue. The ensuing response demonstrated to Weyrich that abortion was the issue to mobilize the evangelical community, and Jerry Falwell was their spokesman.

Less than a year later, Weyrich coined the name of the organization that Falwell would adopt for the new political organization-the Moral Majority (MM).

Strange bedfellows made up MM. Falwell boasted of 72,000 pastors who were Catholic, Jewish, Protestant, and Mormon in a political organization that was “pro-Life, pro-traditional family, pro-moral, and pro-American.”

Absent from MM in any appreciable numbers were black Christians. No surprise. MM grew out of a movement spawned by restricting educational access to black children.

MM had a significant influence on the 1980 political election. In the run-up to the election, religious broadcaster Pat Robertson quoted the pollster Lou Harris:

“Reagan is also winning the votes of that 26% of the white electorate who are followers of the evangelical preachers who have been active in the election. This group is providing Reagan his clear margin in the election.”

To be clear, MM was a white political organization that represented the interests of conservative white Christians. Sadly, black Christians supported many of the same moral issues, but that did not matter because they did not seem to matter to MM. This fact haunts the church to this day.

President Reagan went on to win that election as did a number of conservative senators backed by MM. Jerry Falwell went from relative obscurity to White House insider.

Bowing to power almost always costs you.

MM delivered votes, finances, and elected candidates. Now it was time for the movement to be rewarded.

Despite Republicans having clear majorities in both houses, the Reagan administration did not deliver on its promise to pass a congressional amendment to return prayer to public schools.

Reagan served for eight years in office; yet, the prayer amendment was only brought up once for passage. Concerns over the economy moved the amendment permanently to the back burner.

In 1989, MM disbanded. What did MM accomplish in terms of outcomes that mattered to evangelicals?

Not much said former MM insiders Cal Thomas and Ed Dobson who published “Blinded by Might” in 2000. Thomas argued that “whenever the church cozies up to political power, it loses sight of its all-important mission to change the world from the inside out.”

Political change does not bring moral change.

Fast forward another 20 years of Religious Right activity and Thomas’ words still ring true.

Conservative evangelicals that went from tepid to red-hot on abortion have not overturned Roe vs. Wade in 41 years. The movement has not delivered on returning prayer to public schools.

The movement has not prevented the spread of pornography or defeated the assault against traditional family values.

Moreover, churches in America have been declining in attendance for over a decade. A whole generation of young people is abandoning the church in droves.

The church has lost much of its prophetic voice and too often finds itself the pawn of political parties.

MM insider Cal Thomas came to this conclusion 20 years ago when he said: “…the Religious Right has traded the only power that can truly change America – the Gospel’s power to transform hearts – for the methods of a kingdom that is of this world.”

Bowing to earthly power always exacts a heavy price. After 41 years of missteps, it is time for a course correction.

We must vote in the upcoming elections, but it is time for us to put our trust in God alone and in His government, the increase of which there shall be no end. God Bless! Press On!! Kevin

His government and its peace will never end. He will rule with fairness and justice from the throne of his ancestor David for all eternity. The passionate commitment of the LORD of Heaven’s Armies will make this happen! –Isaiah 9:7

Defeating Racism in the Church-A Divided House is Costly

Ironically, the same young people our churches are trying to reach are at the forefront of protests demanding liberty and justice for all Americans.

He arrived at the church convention site early enough to get his wife comfortably situated in their room at the conference hotel. Then it was off to the auditorium.

He peeked at the conference program and saw the theme, “A House Divided.” Peter was not looking forward to this. He knew what was coming.

Peter took his seat and then reflected. He wondered why social issues kept threatening to derail the church?

He and the other apostles had just settled the dispute about Hebrew widows receiving favor over Grecian widows in the distribution of food. (Acts 6:1-7)

That issue with the widows was minor compared to the Gentile controversy which was about to be debated.

Peter was present because he knew the problem was not going away on its own. 

Jewish priests who became Christians started the controversy by insisting that Gentile believers must be circumcised in order to be saved.

A heated debate took place once the conference got underway, but Peter and Paul presented powerful testimonies. They persuaded the assembled that Gentile believers did not need to be circumcised to be saved. (Acts 15:6-22)

The controversy was resolved through dialogue and active listening. The divided church was restored to unity, but a complex problem remained unresolved.

How do you get historical enemies -Jews, Samaritans, and Gentiles- to worship together in churches?

Paul spent the rest of his life addressing issues like this. He wrote multiple letters -Epistles- to help an increasingly diverse church move forward in a hostile world.

His methodology was simple and effective. He denied himself and identified with the customs, and social norms of the people he was trying to reach.

Paul’s barrier-breaking methodology should be adopted today!

“I have become all things to all men that I might by all means save some. Now this I do for the gospel’s sake, that I may be partaker of it with you.” (1 Corinthians 9:22b-23)

Even the best of us stumble trying to overcome prejudices. Peter fell short.  He stopped eating with Gentile believers because he feared the Jews. Paul rebuked him. (Galatians 2:14)

Peter knew better, but old habits are hard to break especially under peer pressure.

Ever since Jesus prayed for unity among His followers in the Garden of Gethsemane, all the forces of hell determined that His prayer would never come to pass:

 “I do not pray for these alone, but also for those who will believe in Me through their word; that they all may be one, as You, Father, are in Me, and I in You; that they also may be one in Us, that the world may believe that You sent Me. (John 17:20-21)

Jesus knew that A Divided House is Costly. He was the One who said, “a house divided against itself cannot stand.” (Mark 3:25).

Fast forward to a man running for senate in the state of Illinois in 1858 who quoted from scripture:

“A house divided against itself, cannot stand. I believe this government cannot endure permanently half slave and half free…I do not expect the house to fall but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing or all the other.” -Abraham Lincoln, “House Divided” Speech, 16 June 1858.

Lincoln’s “house” metaphor referred to the nation, and it aptly described the church as well.

By the time Lincoln delivered his speech, the three largest Protestant denominations in America -the Methodists (1843), Baptists (1845), and Presbyterians (1837)- divided over the issue of slavery. So what?

John Wesley was an opponent of slavery who called for slave owners to repent and free their slaves in 1773.

The Methodist Church was the largest organization in America. It was a strong cord linking the nation together before the split in 1843.

Ironically, John Wesley, founder of the Methodist Church strongly opposed slavery. He called for slave owners to repent and free their slaves in 1773 in a pamphlet entitled, Thoughts on Slavery.

It is essential to understand that these churches divided years before South Carolina became the first state to secede from the Union in December 1860. 

The church to a large degree set the conditions for the American house to fall.  Kentucky Senator Henry Clay rightly declared that the church splits were “the greatest source of danger to our country.”

During the time of the Civil War, 94% of all churches in the south were a part of the three denominations that supported the enslavement of 4 million black Americans. One out of every seven Americans was a slave during this time.

The moral authority used by the southern churches to justify slavery was the Word of God. Allow that to sink in for a minute.

The Civil War claimed the lives of 620,000 Americans. The end of the war did not grant the former slave’s full citizenship or access to membership in southern churches.

The wheels of justice grind slowly. It took the Southern Baptist Convention 150 years to issue an apology for its stance on slavery back in June 1995.  https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=112329862

At the time of this apology, the SBC also asked forgiveness of African-Americans for failing to support the Civil Rights Movement.

Things appear to be changing with the SBC moving forward based on a statement made by SBC president J.D. Greear, on 9 June 2020.

J.D. Greear chose to engage rather than remain silent.

Greear called for SBC members to declare: Black Lives Matter, and he denounced using All Lives Matter. https://www.foxnews.com/us/black-lives-matter-southern-baptist

Many where shocked when the president of the largest Protestant Christian denomination in America made this statement.

It is interesting to note that prior to Greear’s statement, the SBC had seen the sharpest decline in membership in the last 100 years.

The SBC is not alone. Church attendance across Christian denominations has declined sharply in just the last ten years and especially among young people.

Ironically, the same young people our churches have been trying and failing to reach have been at the forefront of protests demanding liberty and justice for all Americans

Where is the church? Young people are interested in investing their lives in something larger than themselves. Where is the church?

Peter understood centuries ago that social problems do not resolve themselves. Paul taught us to deny ourselves and relate to those different from us for the sake of the gospel.

The church in America owns some responsibility for slavery and the bloodshed of the Civil War. Likewise, it shares some responsibility for the unrest in our streets today.

It may be uncomfortable, but our churches must deal with social injustice in America NOW.

Peter, Paul and those assembled at the Council of Jerusalem demonstrated that unity can be achieved through dialogue and active listening.

I applaud the bold move by J.D. Greear. I hope that other church leaders will follow his example.

A Divided House is Costly. The price is too steep to pay. Let this be our finest hour and our defining moment for the sake of the gospel. God Bless! Press On!! Kevin

How to End Racial Division in the Church

During the period of the most intense racial tension in 20th Century America, God sent an earth-shaking revival marked by interracial worship and led by Bill-an unlikely catalyst.

Bill sat weakened in a chair dictating a letter after suffering a heart attack, Thursday, 28 September 1922.  Hours later, a second heart attack ended his life. 

I wonder what Bill was thinking in the hours before he went to be with Jesus?

Many looked at him as a failure. The Apostolic Faith Mission (AFM) that he pastored now ran less than 30 in attendance, and he was struggling financially.    

Bill started holding services at AFM on 14 April, 1906, at an old dilapidated, two-story frame building after a house church gathering grew too large and too loud.  The neighbors complained to the police so something had to be done.

Unlikely location for a revival that would impact over 50 nations within 2 years

At first Bill pastored a small black congregation, but God showed up so powerfully that white Christians began crossing the color line seeking the baptism of the Holy Spirit. (Acts 2:4)

AFM became the epicenter of Pentecostalism. From this humble location, the movement spread to the entire world. 

I imagine Bill marveled at how he, the son of former slaves, pastored an interracial congregation at the height of the Jim Crow era.

After all, the revival took place only seven years after Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court decision that legalized segregated facilities across America.

The basis of the decision was that separate facilities were not unconstitutional as long as they were equal, but in practice, the facilities were rarely equal. 

Ida B Wells is famous for her anti-lynching campaign.

White supremacist terror groups like the Ku Klux Klan thrived during this era.  Between 1889-1922, 3,456 blacks were documented as being lynched to include 83 women in 44 of 48 states.  Many lynchings went unreported. 

This was a time when theories like Social Darwinism were used to argue that certain groups achieved dominance in society because of their innate superiority. 

Closely associated to this “doctrine of devils” was a new “science” called eugenics which aimed at improving the human race by removing “undesirables.”  Adolph Hitler embraced both theories but he was not alone.  

 Against this backdrop, AFM held services three-times-a-day, seven days a week for 3 1/2 years! You may want to read that again. 

Interracial worship under the leadership of a black man in 1906? Absolutely unheard of.

All nations, all races, and all social classes worshipped at AFM.  Within two years over 50 nations had been impacted. 

“And when the day of Pentecost was fully come, they were all with one accord in one place.” (Acts 2:1).

Bill believed that Pentecost marked the beginning of a new order where all people were accepted, and where God’s love prevailed.  

AFM’s newspaper, The Apostolic Faith, had a mailing list that grew in circulation to 50,000 worldwide.  Bill himself wrote and taught a global audience about the baptism of the Holy Spirit through this periodical. 

AFM church’s building at 312 Azusa Street was located in downtown Los Angeles and is regarded as the most famous address in Pentecostal-Charismatic history.  Why? 

Today there are 600 million Pentecostal-Charismatics in the world.  Nearly all of the church organizations that serve these individuals can trace their roots directly or indirectly to Azusa Street.

The LA Times and others newspapers wrote scathing, racially-stereotyped accounts of the events that took place at Azusa Street. Many theologians denounced the movement.

A favorable view of Pentecostals regarded them as Christians who spoke in tongues, believed in divine healing, and the soon return of the Lord Jesus. 

Bill spoke in tongues.  Bill prayed for the sick.  Bill believed Jesus was coming soon.  But the defining characteristic of AFM was social and ethnic diversity in worship.    

Breaking with many Pentecostals of the era, Bill viewed tongues as a sign of the Holy Spirit baptism and not the sign.  Bill taught that love was the real evidence of being filled with the Holy Spirit:

“If you get angry, speak evil or backbite. I don’t care how many tongues you may have.  You have not the Holy Spirit.” 

Bill believed that walking in the fruit of the Spirit -love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control -was the evidence of the baptism of the Holy Spirit.  (Galatians 5:22-23)

Incredibly, God empowered Bill to put his beliefs into practice before a worldwide audience, 50 years before Martin Luther King and the Civil Rights Movement.

God’s presence overcame Jim Crow and racism.  Pentecostal historian Frank Bartleman put it this way, “the color line was washed away in the blood.”

Cashman got “woke” at Azusa Street.

Gaston Barnibus Cashwell, a white man born in Sampson County, NC visited Azusa Street.  He reacted with alarm and discomfort when black people laid hands on him for prayer in a service led by a white woman.

Cashwell later reported that God “crucified” his racial prejudice.  Cashwell returned to the East Coast and began conducting interracial meetings of his own that drew thousands in Dunn, NC. 

All moves of God have a shelf life and Azusa Street was no different. Internal strife and division led to the demise of the revival.  Loss of the mailing list was a critical factor.

AFM secretary, Florence Crawford became upset when Bill got married to Jennie Evans Moore, 13 May 1908.  Florence believed that the imminent return of Jesus made marriage a distraction.

Crawford stole the mailing list and joined another Pentecostal fellowship in Portland, Oregon that survives to this day.  The loss of the list was devastating in terms of promoting the revival.

In my opinion, analyzing the decline of the revival is of less importance than understanding why God visited AFM, and why God chose to use Bill.

I believe God poured out His Spirit on AFM to declare to a global audience that there is a solution to racism, tribalism, and biases based on class distinctions and gender inequities.

I believe God chose Bill to show the world that He is no respecter of persons. I believe he chose Bill because of his humility and his willingness to yield to the Spirit of God.

Seymour lost his left eye and nearly died from small pox. His healing inspired him to preach the gospel.

Bill is Reverend William Seymour, the catalyst of the Azusa Street Revival.

I believe you can capture the essence of Reverend Seymour’s message in this way. 

The purpose of the baptism of the Holy Spirit is to empower believers with the love of God to proclaim the gospel to the ends of the earth.  (Acts 1:8)

Reverend Seymour was a strong advocate for spiritual gifts, but as the Apostle Paul stated:

“Love never fails. But whether there are prophecies, they will fail; whether there are tongues, they will cease; whether there is knowledge, it will vanish away.” (1 Cor 13:8)

Fast forward to today.  Azusa street offers a practical expression of the Biblical solution to racial division in the church in America:

In Christ, “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” (Galatians 3:28) 

Revisiting the life and ministry of William Seymour gives new meaning to these familiar words:

“If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.” (2 Chronicles 7:14)

I don’t know what Reverend Seymour was thinking in the waning moments of his life.  He was isolated, alone, and marginalized by men, but he was no failure.

“If you were to ask who is the Luther, Calvin or Wesley of the Pentecostal Movement, it would have to be William Seymour” -Dr. Vinson Synan

Reverend William Seymour was one of the greatest and most impactful Christian leaders of the 20th Century. 

His enduring legacy is that Pentecost is not about tongues.  Pentecost is about heavenly empowerment to walk in love and bring men and women into a saving knowledge of Jesus Christ. https://dreamprayernetwork.com/gods-plan-of-salvation/

“You shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free.”  (John 8:32) God Bless! Press On!! Kevin

Video References on William Seymour, AFM & Azusa Street:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WRjYbSNIQ28&t=2372s; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zn2CScpoHyo&t=21s; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPtGJ35jIwA; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXti6tqkX9E

Social media & sharing icons powered by UltimatelySocial
error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)

Share
Instagram